Our Team
NJ Addiction Centers is a small editorial team with a shared conviction: people searching for addiction treatment information deserve the same quality of reporting they would find in a health journalism outlet, not a sales pitch dressed up as a resource page.
Our editorial team includes writers with lived experience, backgrounds in behavioral health, and training in health journalism. The intake team that staffs our help line may refer callers to facilities within our professional network, which can include affiliated providers. Editorial content on this site is produced separately, with facilities selected on editorial merit. We exist to make the addiction treatment landscape in New Jersey easier to understand for the people who need that clarity most — individuals in recovery, family members trying to help, and professionals looking for reliable reference material.
Everything we publish goes through a multi-step editorial process, and every team member brings something different to that process. Here is how our team is structured.
Our Editorial Team
Lead Editor
Our lead editor oversees all content published on the site, from initial topic selection through final review. This role requires a background in health journalism or public health communications, familiarity with SAMHSA and NIDA data sources, and the editorial judgment to know when a claim needs a stronger citation or when a sentence crosses the line from informative to promotional.
The lead editor is responsible for maintaining our editorial standards and ensuring every published page passes a straightforward test: could a journalist at a health publication have written this?
Medical and Clinical Reviewers
Clinical accuracy is not optional in the addiction treatment space. Misinformation about detox timelines, medication-assisted treatment protocols, or levels of care can have real consequences for real people.
Dr. Sarah Mitchell, MD, FASAM — Medical Reviewer
Dr. Sarah Mitchell is a board-certified addiction medicine physician licensed to practice in New Jersey and New York. She serves as the medical reviewer for NJ Addiction Centers, overseeing the clinical accuracy of editorial content covering substance use disorders, treatment modalities, and co-occurring mental health conditions. Her clinical focus includes opioid use disorder, alcohol use disorder, stimulant use disorder, and co-occurring psychiatric conditions.
Pages reviewed by Dr. Mitchell display a “Medically reviewed by” byline with the most recent review date. Non-medical editorial content is produced by the editorial team without individual physician review. Read more about the review boundary and scope on her bio page and in our editorial standards.
Additional clinical reviewers
Beyond Dr. Mitchell, our broader clinical review network includes professionals with credentials in behavioral health counseling and psychiatric care. Their role is not to write content but to review it — checking clinical claims against current evidence, flagging outdated terminology, and ensuring that our descriptions of treatment modalities reflect how they actually work in practice, not how marketing departments describe them.
When we reference ASAM levels of care, insurance parity requirements under the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act, or the distinction between CARF and Joint Commission accreditation, our clinical reviewers verify that those references are accurate and current.
Content Writers
Our writers come from a mix of backgrounds: health journalism, public health research, social work, and community health education. What they share is the ability to take complex clinical and policy information and make it accessible without dumbing it down.
Writers at NJ Addiction Centers follow a structured content process. Every article begins with keyword and intent research grounded in real search data. Drafts go through clinical review, editorial review, and fact-checking before publication. Statistics must be sourced to a named organization and dataset — SAMHSA’s National Survey on Drug Use and Health, the CDC’s WONDER database, the New Jersey Department of Human Services, or peer-reviewed journals. If a real number cannot be found, the sentence gets rewritten. We do not estimate and we do not fabricate.
Community Contributors
Some of our most valuable editorial input comes from people who have direct experience with the addiction treatment system — as patients, as family members, or as recovery community members. These contributors help us understand what questions people actually have, what gaps exist in publicly available information, and where the lived reality of navigating treatment in New Jersey diverges from what clinical literature describes.
We believe that personal and family experience with addiction is a legitimate and important form of expertise. It informs our editorial priorities, shapes the questions we investigate, and keeps our content grounded in the concerns of the people we are writing for.
Community contributors do not provide clinical guidance. Their perspectives are clearly framed as experiential and are always reviewed alongside clinical input.
Our Approach to Addiction Reporting
We treat addiction as a health condition, not a moral failing. That perspective shapes every editorial decision we make.
Accuracy over speed. We would rather publish one well-sourced article per week than five thin pages that add nothing to the conversation. Every statistic is attributed. Every clinical claim is reviewed. Every recommendation is qualified with the context a reader needs to evaluate it for their own situation.
Empathy without enabling. Writing about addiction treatment requires balancing compassion with honesty. We do not use fear-based urgency tactics. We do not promise that any specific program will fix everything. Recovery is a long-term process with setbacks, and our content reflects that reality.
Clinical grounding. Our editorial positions are informed by established clinical frameworks — ASAM criteria for level-of-care placement, SAMHSA’s evidence-based treatment guidelines, and the peer-reviewed research base on treatment outcomes. When evidence is mixed or incomplete, we say so.
Editorial independence. Facilities featured in our guides, best-of lists, and comparison articles are selected on editorial merit, not commercial relationship. Our editorial standards page documents how the distinction between editorial content and help-line intake is maintained.
Contributing and Contact
We welcome contributions from qualified professionals and community members who can strengthen our coverage. We are particularly interested in hearing from:
- Licensed clinicians (LCADC, LPC, LCSW, MD, DO) practicing in New Jersey who can contribute clinical review or subject-matter expertise
- Researchers working on addiction treatment outcomes, health policy, or behavioral health equity in the state
- Recovery community members willing to share experiential perspectives on navigating treatment systems, with appropriate editorial framing
- Policy professionals working on addiction-related legislation, Medicaid access, or treatment funding in New Jersey
If you have expertise that could improve the accuracy or depth of our coverage, we would like to hear from you. Visit our contact page to get in touch.
We do not publish anonymous contributions, and all submitted content goes through our standard editorial and clinical review process before publication.